FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 49 | 50 || 52 | 53 |   ...   | 58 |

«re.press Melbourne 2013 re.press PO Box 40, Prahran, 3181, Melbourne, Australia © the individual contributors and re.press ...»

-- [ Page 51 ] --

The unctuous aggressiveness exhibited by Behzad toward Zeynab is only one episode of his generally insensitive behavior. As he hangs around Siah Darreh waiting for Mrs. Malek to die, he occupies himself not only with bothering Zeynab, but also with trying to take photographs of villagers who cover their faces and command him to put his camera away. The film clearly indicts him for his rudeness and indiscretion, but in what precisely do his crimes consist, and why do the villagers not want their pictures taken? If every subject as alien to herself lacks a proper image of who she is, why is Behzad’s attempt to offer the villagers photographs of themselves counted as an act of rudeness or malice, rather than one of kindness? One of the villagers in Life and Nothing More seems to respond directly to this question when he complains to Farhad, the film-director protagonist of that film, that the images of the villagers captured by his camera make the villagers appear “worse than they are.” It is not the taking of photographs per se, but these particular photographs that are the problem. Behzad and Farhad travel to the villages to document, to archive phenomena on the verge of disappearing. Their mission is to capture a world in the process of being lost, people about to die or presumed to be buried in rubble, ritual practices and ways of life on the edge of extinction. The imminence of loss, of death, licenses the rudeness of the photographers, justifying in their minds their indiscreet attempts to snatch from loss—from transitory, fleeting life—something lasting, images that can be stored in the memory banks of their culture. But it is not merely the race against time that powers their rudeness, for these nosy archivists believe they The Censorship of Interiority confront an additional obstacle in the villagers themselves, who refuse, they assume, to disclose to them the information they seek to record. In other words, what these diegetic film directors disregard while making their images is the jouissance of the villagers that renders them incomprehensible to themselves. These colonizing directors want to pry from the villagers secrets that are not theirs to disclose and thus to claim for the light, for the order of the visible, every dark, hidden thing.

Is Behzad’s obscene rudeness not of the same sort as that made scandalously evident in the Abu Ghraib photographs? The problem is not simply that the photographers in each case invaded the privacy of those whom they photographed; it consists, rather, in the same obscene denial that there is any obscene, any off-screen, that cannot be exposed to a persistent, prying eye. The ultimate crime of both series of photographs, the source of their malicious abjuration of respect, is their assumption that the photographed subjects have no privacy to invade. This is the bottom line, the point on which I am insisting: privacy cannot be invaded, cannot be penetrated, either by the subject or by others.

At the dawn of the twentieth century, Nietzsche expressed his scorn for that century’s characteristic and misguided belief that it was possible to see through everything.23 He protested the lack of reverence and discretion that fueled his contemporaries’ tactless preoccupation with disclosing and unmasking everything. “Nothing is so nauseating in […] the believers in ‘modern ideas,’” he scoffed, “as their lack of shame, their complaisant impudence of eye and hand with which they touch, lick, and finger everything.”24 This frenzied desire to cast aside every veil, penetrate every surface, transgress every barrier standing between us and the real thing lying behind it installed in the modern world a new sort of “beyondness,” a new untouchable, one that is in principle there for the grasping, even if in actuality it is always out of reach. This secularized sacred, which inspires a new, modern desire for transgression, does not originate in a belief in the existence of another world, but in the belief that what we want in this world always lies just behind some roadblock preventing our access to it.

This new “beyondness” is held in place by a definable structure, that of guilt, which must be understood not in its limited, psychological sense, but in the sense I proposed above: a specific form of relation to one’s own culture.

Agamben offers in passing a broader definition of guilt in line with our own;

in Homo Sacer, he defines “the cipher of this capture of life in law” (that is, the cipher of biopolitics) as “guilt (not in the technical sense […] but in the originary sense that indicates a being-in-debt: in culpa esse), which is to say, precisely the condition of being included through an exclusion, of being in relation to something from which one is excluded or which one cannot fully assume.”25 It is the phrase “being in relation to something one cannot […] assume” that first catches our attention, because it happens to be the one 250 Penumbra Levinas uses to describe anxiety and shame, the complex feeling of being riveted to an inalienable and opaque surplus of being. Agamben sets Levinas’s phrase alongside an apposite one of his own, “being in relation to something from which one is excluded.” The latter phrase absorbs and slightly alters the former and thereby defines guilt as a transformation of anxiety. Like anxiety, the feeling of guilt consists in a feeling of being unable to coincide with oneself by integrating the troubling surplus of being; in guilt, however, this inability is no longer experienced as being stuck to an inalienable alienness, but as an inability to close the distance that separates us from something that excludes us. How does this transformation come about? How does one become excluded from a part of oneself with which one cannot quite catch up, rather than attached to what one cannot assume?

We find our answer in the Freudian theory of guilt, in the paradox of the superego (which punishes obedience with guilt) that is inextricable from the paradox of ego and cultural ideals (which we are simultaneously enjoined to live up to and forbidden to attain). Faced with the unbearable opaqueness we are to ourselves, with the unassumable excess that sticks to us, we unburden ourselves by allowing the ideals set up by society to become blueprints for our identity and action and to thereby provide us with some clarity. Through cultural ideals, the question of what it means to belong to a culture is silenced and replaced by mesmerizing cultural goals that gather awestruck subjects.

But because every ideal is sustained by a prohibition against attaining it, we are always in debt to them, always in arrears to our ego and cultural ideals, which insert us into our culture precisely by excluding us from its inner sanctum. The very prohibition/exclusion that binds us to these ideals also invites transgression. What is forbidden lures us with its unattainability—if only we could summon the courage to disobey, the fortitude to step over the line. In short, ideals are the source of that secularized sacred deplored by Nietzsche, the just-beyond-reach that ignores the impenetrability of one’s own as well as others’ self-opacity. What was hidden and paralyzing is now tantalizingly close and urges transgression.

The Ego and the Id presents an argument about guilt profoundly tributary to this one. There, Freud writes that “reflection […] shows us that no external vicissitudes can be experienced or undergone by the id, except by way of the ego, which is the representative of the external world to the id.

Nevertheless it is not possible to speak of direct inheritance in the ego. It is here that the gulf between an actual individual and the concept of a species becomes evident.”26 I understand this “no direct inheritance in the ego” as sanction to treat cultural inheritance as libido or jouissance excited by the brush with ancestral desire.

This inheritance can only lead to anxiety, however, and so must go through the external world, through society, if it is to be accessed or unfolded in some way. The meandering route of inheritance leaves its mark in the fact that the The Censorship of Interiority subject is never completely absorbed into her culture, but is always slightly misaligned with it.

We have yet to see what this means for shame, but for guilt we can now see that it entails a drive to attain what can never be fully acquired and a sense of exclusion from some sacred core of being. With regard to the question of photographic images that is raised in Kiarostami’s films, we can now add the following: if these images make their subjects look worse than they are, this is because the photographs taken by these diegetic filmmakers hold the order of appearances in disdain. For them, appearances are always only a nuisance standing in the way of truth; they lack the dignity of the true. In The Wind Will Carry Us, the fault lies not only with Behzad, but also with the villagers who scar themselves to attract the attention of their bosses. These villagers seem to have bought into the capitalist belief that there is nothing that is not ripe for exposure. They, too, have begun to acquire that immodest, capitalist taste for what C.S. Lewis referred to as a “very cheap [form of] frankness.”27 In this light, the Islamic system of modesty—with its volatile disdain for the modern passion for exposing everything, its loud protestations and rigid protections against the “touching, licking, and fingering” of everything— would seem to offer an important antidote to the global immodesty fashioned by Western capitalism. The system of modesty undeniably targets a worthy enemy, but the question before us is whether it adopts effective measures against its target, whether it succeeds or fails to protect the subject’s modesty.

With this question in mind, we return to the fresh milk sequence in The Wind Will Carry Us to determine if it deserves the tongue lashing Dabashi gives it.


As Behzad descends into the subterranean chamber, the catacomb, where he will catch up with Zeynab, we are invited to wonder, “What sort of place is this?” One need not know anything about villages in Northern Iran to know that not even here do people milk cows in pitch black underground caves. This is no ordinary or actual location, no touristic glimpse of some of Iran’s exotic landscape; it is rather an example of “visionary geography,” a liminal space defined in Islamic philosophy as the place from which new forms emerge.28 After Behzad crosses the threshold, the screen goes black for several long seconds, as if to mark the absolute separation of this from the other spaces in the film. Holding on the black screen for an uncomfortably long time, Kiarostami also allows the depth of the blinding darkness in which Zeynab remains enshrouded to sink in. From the bright sunlight outside, we pass into a place so luminous that nothing stands out against it; a place filled with a light so intense that nothing in it is distinguishable from anything else, a place of pure exposure, of dazzling blackness. While the screen is still black, the voice of Behzad inquires, “Is there anyone here?” Answerable in 252 Penumbra the negative, this question is more profound than it might first seem. For there is in fact no one here in this darkness, no “I,” only the milking of a cow, the gerundive form of the action Zeynab is performing substantivized, lacking any subjective support.

In Being and Nothingness, Sartre describes a scene that is in many points similar to this one in The Wind Will Carry Us. A voyeur, crouched before a keyhole, peers through it intently. At this point, there is nothing but this pure act of looking, peering through a keyhole, the act that totally absorbs the voyeur.29 The voyeur himself is not present. He is precipitated out from his act as a subject only at the point when a sudden rustling of leaves startles him and fills him with shame. The voyeur appears only as the experience of shame, as shame-full in the precise sense. It is only when he senses his being looked at by the “gaze” of an indeterminate other that the voyeur acquires a sentiment of self. The sentiment of self and the experience of shame are synonymous.

The scenes from Kiarostami and Sartre are similar, then, in that in each the gerundive form of an act—milking a cow, peering through a keyhole—indicates the absence of a subject, whose emergence will be marked only later by the arousal of shame.

The apparent dissimilarity between the two acts may make my analogy sound tenuous, however, and so I will address this difficulty by focusing first on the scene of peering through a keyhole. What does Sartre say about it?

Surprisingly little. In fact, he seems remarkably intent on refraining from drawing too much attention to the act in which his Peeping Tom is engaged when interrupted by the gaze. This polite inattention is partly explained by the fact that Sartre does not want to distract from his point that he is not speaking of shame in the “civic” sense, as he says. By this he seems to mean that sense in which, having already entered polite society and learned its rules, one is disgraced by being caught breaking one of them. Sartre is concerned, rather, with a more fundamental sense of shame as that feeling that attends the insertion of the subject into society, his sudden immersion in a world of others. This insertion into the social precedes all measure and every rule by which a subject might find himself judged. It is not, therefore, the nature of his act, the fact that it is one of lascivious looking, that causes the voyeur shame, but the fact that the gaze makes him suddenly aware of the presence of others as such.

There can be no denying, however, that there is something more going on in Sartre’s refusal to utter a peep about this peeping. Plainly, he is sanitizing the scene, scrubbing it clean of sex. Less discreet, Lacan returns to the scene precisely to highlight the presence of sex in it. It is not by chance, he unblinkingly observes, that shame catches the voyeur in a moment of desire.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 49 | 50 || 52 | 53 |   ...   | 58 |

Similar works:

«March 4, 2016 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BROKERAGE SERVICES FOR FIDELITY AND CRIME INSURANCE PLACEMENT PROGRAM (2016 THROUGH 2019) (RFP #45177) Dear Sir or Madam: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Authority”) is seeking proposals (“Proposals”) in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) for a brokerage firm (the “Firm”) to provide the placement of Fidelity and Crime Insurance for a term of three (3) years (2016The Authority reserves the right to extend...»

«Copyright © Tarek Kakhia. All rights reserved. http://tarek.kakhia.org ADANA UNIVERSTY – INDUSTRY JOINT RESEARCH CENTER INTRODUCTIN TO FERTILIZER INDUSTRIES BY TAREK ISMAIL KAKHIA Copyright © Tarek Kakhia. All rights reserved. http://tarek.kakhia.org ADANA UNIVERSTY – INDUSTRY JOINT RESEARCH CENTER page Item 3 Fertilizer 71 N P K rating 17 Fertilizers Inorganic Acids: 21 Sulfur 53 Sulfur Dioxide 11 Sulfur Trioxide 44 Sulfuric Acid 35 Nitrogen 35 Liquid Nitrogen 37 Nitrogen Cycle 51...»

«Investing in Austria 6th, completely revised edition Preslmayr Rechtsanwälte Edited by: Attorneys-At-Law, Vienna, and Auditor Treuhand GmbH, Vienna Information accurate as of: January 1, 2005 All rights reserved Also published: Praxishandbuch Datenschutzrecht Leitfaden für richtiges Registrieren, Verarbeiten, Übermitteln, Zustimmen, Outsourcen uvm. (Practical Handbook on Data Protection), 2003 Handbuch der Produkthaftung, 2. Auflage (Handbook on Product Liability, 2nd edition), LexisNexis,...»

«121 FERC 61,148 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T. Kelliher, Chairman; Suedeen G. Kelly, Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, and Jon Wellinghoff. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation Docket Nos. RP07-479-000 RP07-479-001 RP07-479-002 ORDER ACCEPTING TARIFF SHEETS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS (Issued November 15, 2007) 1. On June 5, 2007, as amended August 1, 2007 and August 17, 2007, pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), Columbia...»

«GALVESTON COLLEGE/ DISTANCE LEARNING Distance Learning Handbook: A Guide for Students Galveston College 4015 Avenue Q Phone 409.944.1324 • Fax 409.944.1500 [Rev. 10/01/15] Table of Contents Introduction Distance Learning at Galveston College Frequently Asked Questions about Distance Learning Tips for Successful Learning Getting Started Admission to Galveston College Advising and Orientation Registration Student Services and Support Important Galveston College Phone Numbers About Your Computer...»

«The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio Journal of Science (Ohio Academy of Science) Ohio Journal of Science: Volume 84, Issue 5 (December, 1984) 1984-12 Obituaries of Members of the Ohio Academy of Science: Report of the Necrology Committee The Ohio Journal of Science. v84, n5 (December, 1984), 271-277 http://hdl.handle.net/1811/23038 Downloaded from the Knowledge Bank, The Ohio State University's institutional repository OBITUARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE OHIO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE:...»

«2001-018-de Umwelt und Tourismus Grundlagen für einen Bericht der Bundesregierung Darmstadt/Berlin, 2001 Kurzfassung/Summary Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit F+E-Vorhaben 200 87 112 Öko-Institut e.V. Martin Schmied, Öko-Institut e.V. Geschäftsstelle Freiburg Matthias Buchert, Öko-Institut e.V. Postfach 6226 Christian Hochfeld, Öko-Institut e.V. D-79038 Freiburg Beate Schmitt, Öko-Institut e.V. Tel.: 0761-4 52 95-0 Büro Darmstadt...»

«1 The Big Picture in Bilingual Education: A Meta-analysis Corrected for Gersten’s Coding Error Kellie Rolstad Arizona State University Kate Mahoney State University of New York Gene V Glass Arizona State University Abstract In light of a recent revelation that Gersten (1985) included erroneous information on one of two programs for English Language Learners (ELLs), the authors re-calculate results of their earlier meta-analysis of program effectiveness studies for ELLs in which Gersten’s...»

«Ingrid Zumtobel-Amann Claus Brüstle Anselm Hartmann Helmut Sonderegger (Vorarlberger Landeskonservatorium Feldkirch) Burn-out bei MusikschullehrernInnen in Vorarlberg. Eine empirische Studie 1. Problemstellung Empirische Studien zum Burn-out bei MusikschullehrernInnen liegen bislang nicht vor. Dies verwundert umso mehr, als Burn-out insbesondere bei Lehrenden an Allgemeinbildenden Schulen und bei Pflegeberufen seit Ende der 1970er Jahre sehr eingehend untersucht und dargelegt worden ist. Die...»

«74TH SEASON OF CONCERTS october 23  –  25, 2015 • national gallery of art Jean Sibelius (undated), Carl Nielsen photographed courtesy the Finnish Museum in 1908 by Georg Lindstrøm, of Photography courtesy Wikipedia 2 • National Gallery of Art CELEBRATION Three concerts honoring the 150th anniversaries of Jean Sibelius and Carl Nielsen Finnish violinist and composer Jean Sibelius (1865 – 1957) is perhaps the most important composer associated with nationalism in music and one of...»

«Thinking through Objects G.C.AZEVEDO D.F.A i Thinking through Objects Gisel Carriconde Azevedo A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the School of Arts and Digital Industries, University of East London, for the degree of Professional Doctorate in Fine Art. September 2012 ii Cover. Gisel Carriconde Azevedo (2009), Aphrodite, [Floor installation], APT Gallery, London Figure 1. Gisel Carriconde Azevedo (1997), Untitled [Acrilyc on PVC] 3 Figure 2. Gisel Carriconde Azevedo...»

«Fachtagung „MigrantInnen in der Freiwilligenarbeit“ Analysen – Trends – Best Practice 22./23. April 2010 im forte FortBildungszentrum Elisabethinen Linz VORWORT Die aktive gesellschaftliche Teilhabe von MigrantInnen (derzeit rund 15 Prozent der österreichischen Bevölkerung) setzt Impulse frei für das gesellschaftliche und kulturelle Zusammenleben. Sinnvolle und ernst gemeinte Bestrebungen nach Integration müssen verschiedenste Sphären umfassen unter anderem den Bereich...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.