WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 12 | 13 || 15 | 16 |   ...   | 58 |

«re.press Melbourne 2013 re.press PO Box 40, Prahran, 3181, Melbourne, Australia © the individual contributors and re.press ...»

-- [ Page 14 ] --

between hard neutral facts and “values” that we, the judging subjects, impose onto the facts; and so on) which are stricto sensu meaningless in the premodern universe. Of course, a realist can retort that this is the whole point: only with the passage to the modern scientific universe did we get an appropriate notion of what “objective reality” is, in contrast to the premodern outlook that 68 Penumbra confused “facts” and “values.” Against this, the transcendental-hermeneutic philosopher would be fully justified to insist that, nonetheless, we cannot get out of the vicious circle of presupposing our result: the most fundamental way reality “appears” to us, the most fundamental way we experience what “really counts as effectively existing,” is always already presupposed in our judgments of what “really exists.” This transcendental level was very nicely indicated by Kuhn himself when, in his Structure of Scientific Revolutions, he claimed that the shift in a scientific paradigm is more than a mere shift in our (external) perspective on/perception of reality, but nonetheless less than our effectively “creating” another new reality. For that reason, the standard distinction between the social or psychological contingent conditions of a scientific invention and its objective truth-value falls short here: the very distinction between the (empirical, contingent socio-psychological) genesis of a certain scientific formation and its objective truth-value, independent of the conditions of this genesis, already presupposes a set of distinctions (e.g., between genesis and truth-value) that are by no means self-evident. So, again, one should insist here that the hermeneutic-transcendental questioning of the implicit presuppositions in no way endorses the historicist relativism typical of cultural studies.

Knowledge and Truth In what, then, does the ultimate difference between cognitivism and cultural studies consist? On the one hand, there is neutral objective knowledge, that is, the patient empirical examination of reality. Cognitivists like to emphasize that, politically, they are not against the Left—their aim is precisely to liberate the Left from the irrationalist-relativist-elitist postmodern imposter;

nonetheless, they accept the distinction between the neutral theoretical (scientific) insight and the eventual ideologico-political bias of the author. In contrast, cultural studies involves the properly dialectical paradox of a truth that relies on an engaged subjective position. This distinction between knowledge inherent to the academic institution, defined by the standards of “professionalism,” and, on the other hand, the truth of a (collective) subject engaged in a struggle (elaborated, among others, by philosophers from Theodor Adorno to Alain Badiou), enables us to explain how the difference between cognitivists and proponents of cultural studies functions as a shibboleth: it is properly visible only from the side of cultural studies. So, on the one hand, one should fully acknowledge the solid scholarly status of much of the cognitivist endeavor—often, it is academia at its best; on the other hand, there is a dimension that simply eludes its grasp. Let me elaborate this relationship between truth and the accuracy of knowledge by means of a marvelous thought experiment evoked by Daniel Dennett in his Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: You and your best friend are about to be captured by hostile forces, who know English but do not know much about your world. You both know Morse code, and hit upon Lacan between Cultural Studies and Cognitivism the following impromptu encryption scheme: for a dash, speak a truth; for

a dot, speak a falsehood. Your captors, of course, listen to you two speak:

“Birds lay eggs, and toads fly. Chicago is a city, and my feet are not made of tin, and baseball is played in August,” you say, answering “No” (dash-dot;

dash-dash-dash) to whatever your friend has just asked. Even if your captors know Morse code, unless they can determine the truth and falsity of these sentences, they cannot detect the properties that stand for the dot and dash.5 Dennett himself uses this example to make the point that meaning cannot be accounted for in purely syntactic inherent terms: the only way to ultimately gain access to the meaning of a statement is to situate it in its life-world context, that is, to take into account its semantic dimension, the objects and processes to which it refers. My point is rather different. As Dennett himself puts it, the two prisoners, in this case, use the world itself as a “one-time pad.” Although the truth-value of their statements is not indifferent but crucial, it is not this truth-value as such, in itself, that matters; what matters is the translation of truth-value into a differential series of pluses and minuses (dashes and dots) that delivers the true message in Morse code. And is something similar not going on in the psychoanalytic process? Although the truth-value of the patient’s statements is not indifferent, what really matters is not this truthvalue as such, but the way the very alternation of truths and lies discloses the patient’s desire—a patient also uses reality itself (the way [s]he relates to it) as a “one-time pad” to encrypt his or her desire. And, in the same way, theory uses the very truth-value (accuracy) of post-theoretical knowledge as a medium to articulate its own truth-message.





On the other hand, politically correct proponents of cultural studies often pay for their arrogance and lack of a serious approach by confusing truth (the engaged subjective position) and knowledge, that is, by disavowing the gap that separates them, by directly subordinating knowledge to truth (say, a quick socio-critical dismissal of a specific science like quantum physics or biology without proper acquaintance with the inherent conceptual structure of this field of knowledge). Essentially, the problem of cultural studies is often the lack of specific disciplinary skills: a literary theorist without proper knowledge of philosophy can write disparaging remarks on Hegel’s phallogocentrism, on film, and so on. What we are dealing with here is a kind of false universal critical capacity to pass judgments on everything without proper knowledge. With all its criticism of traditional philosophical universalism, cultural studies effectively functions as a kind of ersatz-philosophy, and notions are thus transformed into ideological universals. In postcolonial studies, for instance, the notion of “colonization” starts to function as a hegemonic notion and is elevated to a universal paradigm, so that in relations between the sexes, the male sex colonizes the female sex, the upper classes colonize the lower classes, and so on. Especially with some “progressive” interpreters of contemporary biology, it is popular to focus on the way the opposing 70 Penumbra positions are overdetermined by the politico-ideological stance of their authors. Does Dawkins’ “Chicago gangster theory of life,” this reductionist determinist theory about “selfish genes” caught in a deadly struggle for survival, not express the stance of a competitive, bourgeois individualist society? Is Gould’s emphasis on sudden genetic change and ex-aptation not a sign of the more supple, dialectical and “revolutionary” Leftist stance of its author?

Do those who emphasize spontaneous cooperation and emerging order (like Lynn Margulis) not express the longing for a stable organic order, for a society that functions as a “corporate body”? Do we thus not have here the scientific expression of the basic triad of Right, Center and Left—of the organicist conservative notion of society as a whole, of the bourgeois individualist notion of society as the space of competition between individuals, and of the revolutionary theorist notion of sudden change? (Of course, the insistence

on a holistic approach and emerging order can be given a different accent:

it can display the conservative longing for a stable order, or the progressive utopian belief in a new society of solidary cooperation where order grows spontaneously from below and is not imposed from above.) The standard form of the opposition is the one between the “cold” mechanist probing into causality, displaying the attitude of the scientific manipulator in the service of the exploitative domination of nature, and the new “holistic” approach focused on spontaneously emerging order and cooperation, pointing toward what Andrew Ross called a “kinder, gentler science.” The mistake here is the same as that of Stalinist Marxism, which opposed “bourgeois” to “proletarian” science, or that of pseudo-radical feminism, which opposes “masculine” to “feminine” discourse as two self-enclosed wholes engaged in warfare. We do not have two sciences, but one universal science split from within, that is, caught in the battle for hegemony.6 Theoretical State Apparatuses The academically-recognized “radical thought” in the liberal West does not operate in a void, but is indeed a part of power relations. Apropos of cultural studies, one has to ask again the old Benjaminian question: not “How does one explicitly relate to power?” but “How is one situated within predominant power relations?” Does cultural studies not also function as a discourse that pretends to be critically self-reflective, to render visible the predominant power relations, while it effectively obfuscates its own mode of participating in them? So it would be productive to apply to cultural studies itself the Foucauldian notion of productive “bio-power” as opposed to “repressive”/ prohibitory legal power: what if the field of cultural studies, far from effectively threatening today’s global relations of domination, fits within this framework perfectly, in the same way that sexuality and the “repressive” discourses that regulate it are fully complementary? What if the criticism of patriarchal/ identitarian ideology betrays an ambiguous fascination with it, rather than a Lacan between Cultural Studies and Cognitivism will committed to undermining it? There is a way to avoid responsibility and/ or guilt precisely by emphasizing one’s responsibility or too readily assuming guilt in an exaggerated way, as in the case of the politically correct white male academic who emphasizes the guilt of racist phallogocentrism, and uses this admission of guilt as a stratagem not to confront the way he, as a “radical” intellectual, perfectly fits the existing power relations of which he pretends to be thoroughly critical. Crucial here is the shift from British to American cultural studies. Even if we find the same themes and notions in both, the socio-ideological functioning is thoroughly different: we shift from the effective engagement with working class culture to the academic radical chic.

However, despite these critical remarks, the very fact that there is resistance to cultural studies proves that it remains a foreign body unable to fit fully into the existing academy. Cognitivism is ultimately the attempt to get rid of this intruder, to re-establish the standard functioning of academic knowledge—“professional,” rational, empirical, problem-solving, and so on.

The distinction between cognitivism and cultural studies is thus not simply the distinction between two doctrines or two theoretical approaches; it is ultimately a much more radical distinction between two totally different modalities or, rather, practices of knowledge, inclusive of two different institutional apparatuses of knowledge. This dimension of “theoretical state apparatuses,” to use the Althusserian formulation, is crucial: if we do not take it into account, we simply miss the point of the antagonism between cognitivism and cultural studies. It is no wonder that cognitivists like to emphasize their opposition to psychoanalysis: two exemplary cases of such non-academic knowledge are, of course, Marxism and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis differs from cognitivist psychology and psychotherapy in at least three crucial features: (1) since it does not present itself as empirically-tested objective knowledge, there is the perennial problem (in the United States, where psychiatric care is sometimes covered by medical insurance) of the extent to which the state or insurance will reimburse the patient; (2) for the same reason, psychoanalysis has inherent difficulties in integrating itself into the academic edifice of psychology or medical psychiatry departments, so it usually functions as a parasitic entity that attaches itself to cultural studies, comparative literature or psychology departments; (3) as to their inherent organization, psychoanalytic communities do not function as “normal” academic societies (like sociological, mathematical or other societies). From the standpoint of “normal” academic societies, the psychoanalytic society cannot but appear as a “dogmatic” discipline engaged in eternal factional struggles between sub-groups dominated by a strong authoritarian or charismatic leader; conflicts within psychoanalytic communities are not resolved through rational argumentation and empirical testing, but rather resemble sectarian religious struggles. In short, the phenomenon of (personal) transference functions here in an entirely different way than in the “standard” academic community. (The dynamics in Marxist 72 Penumbra communities are somewhat similar.) In the same way that Marxism interprets the resistance against its insights as the “result of the class struggle in theory,” as accounted for by its very object, psychoanalysis also interprets the resistance against itself to be the result of the very unconscious processes

that are its topic. In both cases, theory is caught in a self-referential loop:



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 12 | 13 || 15 | 16 |   ...   | 58 |


Similar works:

«Quality Assessment for Geographic Web Services Pedro Ferreira Fernandes e Melo Medeiros Dissertation for the achievement of the degree: Master in Computer Engineering Jury President: Prof. José Tribolet Supervisors: Prof. José Borbinha and Prof. Bruno Martins External examiner: Prof. Mário Gomes October 2009 Resumo A capacidade de avaliar a qualidade de um serviço é um factor essencial para a diferenciação do sucesso dos fornecedores de serviços. A qualidade dos serviços Web...»

«Fund af Vildhest (Eqvus caballus) fra Overgangen mellem Sen* og Postglacialtid i Danmark. Af J O H S. IVERSEN. Mit einer Zusammenfassung. (Denne Afhandling er ogsaa trykt i D.G. U. 4. Hække, Bd. 2, Nr. 13). Fra Hr. Realskolebestyrer B. THOELACIUS USSING modtog Universitetets Zoologiske Museum i April 1933 en Knogle, som var fundet ved en Kældergravning i Fjerritslev. Det viste sig at være et Laarben af en Hest, og Dr. M. DEGEEBØL sendte den til D a n m a r k s G e o l o g i s k e U n d e r...»

«085864/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 28/11/15 Rat der Europäischen Union Brüssel, den 13. November 2015 (OR. en) 12895/15 ADD 1 PV/CONS 52 JAI 737 COMIX 481 ENTWURF EINES PROTOKOLLS 3415. Tagung des Rates der Europäischen Union (JUSTIZ UND Betr.: INNERES) vom 8. und 9. Oktober 2015 in Luxemburg 12895/15 ADD 1 hal/GT/pg 1 DE DPG www.parlament.gv.at TAGESORDNUNGSPUNKTE MIT ÖFFENTLICHKEIT DER BERATUNGEN 1 Seite BERATUNGEN ÜBER GESETZGEBUNGSAKTE A-PUNKTE (Dok. 12632/15 PTS A 71) 1. Verordnung des...»

«Luminair for iPad User Manual Luminair for iPad User Manual v2 © 2012 Synthe FX, LLC. All Rights Reserved Welcome Thank you for purchasing Luminair for iPad! Luminair is revolutionary lighting control software that allows you wirelessly control, view & record snapshots from intelligent DMX lighting xtures, dimmers, consoles, other software and media servers, all from your iPad. Using the Art-Net and sACN E1.31 protocols over your device’s built-in Wi-Fi connection, Luminair wirelessly...»

«Trent Horn Answering Atheism How to Make the Case for God with Logic and Charity San Diego Contents Introduction: Can You Give Me a Good Reason?..... 9 Part I: The God Debate 1. Theism, atheism, and the God debate......... 15 2. Getting rid of bad attitudes.............. 27 Part II: Should I Be an Atheist?3. Is atheism true?.................... 41 4. Did man invent God?................. 53 5. Is God a contradiction?..........»

«Universidad Firmado digitalmente por Universidad Tecnológica de Querétaro Nombre de reconocimiento (DN): Tecnológica de cn=Universidad Tecnológica de Querétaro, o=Universidad Tecnológica de Querétaro, Querétaro ou, email=webmaster@uteq.edu.mx, c=MX Fecha: 2012.08.31 11:47:31 -05'00' UNIVERSIDAD TECNOLOGICA DE QUERÉTARO Nombre del Proyecto “MANUAL DE INSTALACIÓN, AJUSTE Y MANTENIMIENTO DE LA MÁQUINA CORTADORA LASER” Empresa: TECNOSUIZA S.A. DE C.V. Memoria que como parte de los...»

«Digital Voice Announcers Buyers’ Guide The most comprehensive source for all of Vikings’ Announcement Systems Handle n alls o more c lines! g existin Model DVA-2WA Model DVA-3003 Model DVA-1003B Model DVA-500A Model DVA-LP Model K-2000-DVA Provided by VIKING ELECTRONICS Hudson, WI 54016 • (715) 386-8861 Help@VikingElectronics.com Visit Our Web Site: www.VikingElectronics.com Telecom and Security Solutions for the 21st Century Digital Voice Announcers – That’s right, they’re...»

«15.06.2015 Gericht BVwG Entscheidungsdatum 15.06.2015 Geschäftszahl W211 1435572-1 Spruch W211 1435572-1/25E IM NAMEN DER REPUBLIK! Das Bundesverwaltungsgericht hat durch die Richterin Mag.a SIMMA als Einzelrichterin über die Beschwerde von XXXX, geboren am XXXX, StA. Somalia, gegen den Bescheid des Bundesasylamtes vom XXXX, nach Durchführung einer mündlichen Verhandlung zu Recht erkannt: A) I. Die Beschwerde wird gemäß § 3 AsylG 2005 hinsichtlich Spruchpunkt I. als unbegründet...»

«Newsletter January 2014 Bullseye Class Association Letter from the President What is unusual about this Class is a very neat tradition of year-round Bullseye sailing. As this issue is ready to go to press in November, many of the members are hauling their Bullseyes and lashing tarps, but most of our fleet of 22 boats in Key Largo are coming out out of summer storage. The excitement of the first series race Sat Nov 23 is a mirror image of the sadness of no more soft water sailing in the Northern...»

«Lund University Center for Language and Literature Department of Arabic and Middle Eastern Studies B. A. Essay Protagonist-Antagonist Dichotomy in Palestinian Children’s Literature By: Josefine Burman Supervisor: Lena Ambjörn Date: Spring Semester 2012 Keywords: Children’s Literature, Palestinians, Israelis, Protagonist, Antagonist Abstract Title: Protagonist-Antagonist Dichotomy in Palestinian Children’s Literature Author: Josefine Burman This essay is a study in protagonist-antagonist...»

«Enrique Fernández Darraz Gero Lenhardt Robert D. Reiz Manfred Stock Private Hochschulen in Chile, Deutschland, Rumänien und den USA Struktur und Entwicklung 3‘09 Enrique Fernández Darraz / Gero Lenhardt / Robert D. Reisz / Manfred Stock: Private Hochschulen in Chile, Deutschland, Rumänien und den USA – Struktur und Entwicklung (HoF-Arbeitsbericht 3’09). Hrsg. vom Institut für Hochschulforschung (HoF) an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Wittenberg 2009. 116 S. ISBN...»

«Электронное научное издание Альманах Пространство и Время. Т. 3. Вып. 1 • 2013 Специальный выпуск ПРОСТРАНСТВО И ВРЕМЯ ГРАНИЦ Electronic Scientific Edition Almanac Space and Time Special issue 'Space, Time, and Boundaries’ Elektronische wissenschaftliche Auflage Almabtrieb ‘Raum und Zeit‘ Spezialausgabe ‘Der Raum und die Zeit der Grenzen‘ Естественные границы Natural...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.