FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 8 | 9 || 11 | 12 |   ...   | 22 |

«ARTICLES What's Wrong With Sexual Harassment? Katherine M. Franke* In this article, Professor Franke asks and answers a seemingly simple question: ...»

-- [ Page 10 ] --

at 1534-38 (addressing the employer's First Amendment concerns and concluding that injunctive relief would not violate guarantee of free speech); Kingsley R. Browne, Title VII as Censorship: HostileEnvironment Harassment and the FirstAmendment, 52 Omo ST. L.J. 481 (1991) (arguing that regulation of harassing speech under Title VII constitutes impermissible viewpoint discrimination and chills speech); Jules B. Gerard, The FirstAmendment in a Hostile Environment:A Primer on Free Speech and Sexual Harassment, 68 NoTRE DAME L. REV. 1003 (1993) (arguing that the EEOC guidelines on sexual harassment are probably facially unconstitutional because they are overbroad, and as applied they sweep in protected speech); Eugene Volokh, Comment, Freedom of Speech and Workplace Harassment, 39 UCLA L. Rv. 1791 (1992) (arguing that harassment law currently regulates too broadly and proposing a new framework by which to draw the line between harassing workplace speech that must be protected and that which may be regulated). These arguments have been answered by those who seek a middle ground between the First Amendment and sexual harassment doctrine, see, e.g., Marcy Strauss, Sexist Speech in the Workplace, 25 HARv. C.R.-C.L. L. REv. 1 (1990) (arguing that courts should balance First Amendment concerns against the state's interest in eradicating sexist speech from the workplace), and by those who see no First Amendment right, see CATHARiNE A. MACKINNON, ONLY VoRDS 109 (1993) (proposing redefining free speech rights to account for the law of equality); Suzanne Sangree, Title VII ProhibitionsAgainst Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment and the FirstAmendment: No Collisionin Sight, 47 RuTGERs L. REv. 461, 475 (1995) (arguing that Browne and Volokh overstate the conflict between the First Amendment and harassment law, and that "First Amendment interests are not substantially furthered by allowing free reign to speech which effectuates discrimination"); Nadine Strossen, Regulating Workplace Sexual Harassmentand Upholding the FirstAmendment-Avoiding a Collision, 37 ViL. L. REv. 757, 777-82 (1992) (arguing that some regulation of workplace sexual harassment is necessary to the advancement of women's equality, but that too much regulation would undermine the goals of both free speech and equality).

152. Demetrius Martin, Appeal No. 01934718, 1994 WL 746784 (EEOC Sept. 29, 1994).

HeinOnline -- 49 Stan. L. Rev. 722 1996-1997


April 1997] determined that he had not made out a prima facie case of sexual harassment because "the terms 'sweetie pie' and 'bitch,' though they appear to be derogatory references to appellant's sexual orientation, are not explicitly sexual in nature."' 53 In Mogilefsky v. Superior Court,1 a male employee charged that his male supervisor violated California's Fair Employment and Housing Act when he ordered Mogilefsky to play a pornographic video and asked how much he would charge to perform acts similar to those seen on film. 155 The state appeals court reversed a lower court's order granting the defendant's demurrer, concluding that conduct of a sexual nature is always "because of sex" for purposes of the statute, "whether motivated by hostility or by sexual interest."' Martin and Mogilefsky, however, represent the minority view of the significance of the sexual nature of the conduct to a claim of same-sex sexual harassment. Unlike the different-sex cases, in same-sex cases brought under Title VII most courts demand that the plaintiff show something more than that the conduct was unwelcome and of a sexual nature. In Vandeventer v. Wabash National Corp.,15 7 for instance, the male plaintiff alleged that a male coworker used obscene language toward him. In ruling on the defendant's summary

judgment motion, the court held:

The words "sex" and "sexual" create definitional problems because they can mean either "relating to gender" or "relating to sexual/reproductive behavior." The two are not the same, but are certainly related and easily confused.

Title VII only recognizes harassment based on the first meaning, although that frequently involves the second meaning. However, harassment which involves sexual behavior or has sexual behavior overtones (i.e., remarks, touching, display of pornographic pictures) but is not based on gender bias does not state a claim under Title VII. 58 The court then went on to state that when a man touches a woman in a sexual manner, it can be presumed that he does so because of her sex, but that such a presumption should not be drawn from intra-male sexual behavior. Something else must be shown in order to establish the "because of sex" element of the prima facie same-sex sex harassment case. According to the Vandeventer court, merely calling the plaintiff a "dick sucker" was not enough, because "[tihis was a common epithet, not a sexual advance." 159 So too, in Johnson v.

Hondo, Inc.,160 the court treated comments such as "suck my dick" as crude, boorish, and vulgar, thus evidencing a grudge match between two male employees, but not discrimination because of sex.161

153. Id. at *4.

154. 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 116 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993).

155. See id. at 117.

156. Id. at 119.

157. 887 F. Supp. 1178 (N.D. Ind. 1995).

158. Id. at 1181 (footnote omitted).

159. Id. at 1181 n.2.

160. 940 F. Supp. 1403 (E.D. Wis. 1996).

161. Id. at 1410.

HeinOnline -- 49 Stan. L. Rev. 723 1996-1997 [Vol. 49:691


In contrast, however, if a man calls a female coworker a "fucking cunt" this term is not considered a mere epithet. 162 And without question, if a male employee asked a female employee to "suck my dick," no court would hesitate to find a violation of Title VII. Thus, the transparency of the sexism in differentsex harassment does not transfer to same-sex harassment cases. Something more than sexual conduct must be proved to render the conduct sex discrimination.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's recent opinion in Melnychenko v. 84 Lumber Company163 provides a salient illustration of the gap between sex and sexism in sexual harassment doctrine. Leonid Melnychenko, James Quill, and Stephen LaRochelle accused the male manager of the lumber store at which they all worked of grabbing their genitals, fondling their buttocks, exposing himself, and asking for blow jobs, among other things. 164 A Massachusetts employee is protected against workplace harassment under two different provisions of the Massachusetts Fair Employment Act. 165 One provision prohibits discrimination "based on sex," which general language has been judicially interpreted to include a prohibition against sexual harassment. 166 A separate provision of the same law, however, renders sexual harassment a per se violation of the law, without requiring that the plaintiff show that the conduct was undertaken "based on" or "because of" the victim's sex.

Upon the urging of the State Attorney General as amicus curiae, 168 the Supreme Judicial Court in Melnychenko ruled that the conduct alleged by the plaintiffs was a per se violation of the Massachusetts Fair Employment Act and did not require that the plaintiffs demonstrate that same-sex sexual harassment was discrimination "because of the victim's sex."' 69 The statute as issue in Melnychenko is, in an important sense, a more honest legislative approach to the problem. That is, by dropping out the "because of sex" or "based upon sex" element of the sexual harassment prima facie case, the Massachusetts legislature codified what was already taking place in most courts.

162. See Steiner v. Showboat Operating Co., 25 F.3d 1459, 1464 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 73 (1995); Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co., 589 F. Supp. 780, 782 (E.D. Wisc. 1984), afT'd in part and rev'd in part, 789 F.2d 540 (7th Cir. 1988). But see Galloway v. General Motors Serv. Parts Operations, 78 F.3d 1164, 1168 (7th Cir. 1996) (holding that a man calling a female coworker "bitch" did not, under the facts presented, constitute sexual harassment, but noting that "[tihe terms 'fucking broads' and 'fucking cunts' are more gendered than 'bitch"').

163. 1997 WL 63637 (Mass. Feb. 18, 1997).

164. See Brief Amicus Curiae of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, Women's Bar Association of Massachusetts, American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, & Massachusetts Lesbian and Gay Bar Association at 4, Melnychenko v. Lumber Co., 1997 WL 63637 (Mass. Feb. 18, 1997) (No.


165. See MAss. GEN. LAWS ANN. ch. 151B (vest 1996)

166. See id. § 4(1) (prohibiting discrimination "because of sex"); College-Town, Div. of Interco, Inc. v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 508 N.E.2d 587, 591 (Mass. 1987) (interpreting the general language pertaining to discrimination "because of sex" to evidence a legislative intent to prohibit sexual harassment).

167. See MASS. GEN. LAWS ANN. ch. 151B, § 4(16A) (West 1996).

168. See Brief of the Attorney General Amicus Curiae at 27-28, Melnychenko v. Lumber Co., 1997 WL 63637 (Mass. Feb. 18, 1997) (No. 07029).

169. See Melnychenko, 1997 WL 63637, at *2.

HeinOnline -- 49 Stan. L. Rev. 724 1996-1997


April 1997] However, under Title VII, neither the different-sex nor same-sex cases satisfactorily answer the question: What is sexist about sex? In the different-sex cases, for the most part, the link is simply presumed. Yet, in the same-sex cases, many courts observe that Title VII does not and should not be read to collapse sex and sexism-something more is needed for sexual conduct to be considered sexually discriminatory. Both MacKinnon and Estrich want to provide that something more. Estrich's concern with the social construction of male and female sexuality stems from deep skepticism about when or whether sexual conduct between men and women in the workplace can ever take place in the absence of coercion. She finds merit in the assertion that "there is no such thing as truly 'welcome' sex between a male boss and a female employee who needs herjob."'170 To those who say that a male supervisor's advances are not sexual harassment unless the woman objects, Estrich replies: "At the very least, we might demand that such men look for 'love' outside of work, or at least ask for it first."1 7 1 Both Estrich and MacKinnon share a grave doubt that sexual conduct could ever be equally offensive to male and female employees alike.

Based on this, Estrich makes a rather austere recommendation:

As things stand now, we protect the right of a few to have "consensual" sex in the workplace (a right most women, according to the studies, do not even want), at the cost of exposing the overwhelming majority to oppression and indignity at work. Is the benefit to the few so great as to outweigh the costs to so many more? I think not. For my part, I would have no objection to rules which prohibited men and women from sexual relations in the workplace, at least between those who worked directly for the other.

According to this view, men should keep their hands off women in the workplace' 74 and refrain from sex-talk that reflects "the most traditional and most sexist attitudes."' 7 5 Further, sexual relations between coworkers, even if "consensual," should be deemed per se inappropriate in the workplace.' Sexual harassment is sex discriminationbecause it is 3.

sexually subordinating.

The argument has been made that sexual harassment is a kind of sex discrimination either because it violates formal equality principles, or because it is sexual. A third approach advances another way to understand sexual harassment as a kind of discrimination based on sex: it is a practice that subordinates

170. Estrich, supra note 34, at 831.

171. Id. at 828.

172. Francis Olsen could be read to take the same dim view of sex in the workplace. See Francis E. Olsen, The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform, 96 HARv. L. REv. 1497, 1551 (1983) ("One explanation for banning sexual harassment is that such behavior does not belong in the marketplace.").

173. Estrich, supra note 34, at 860.

174. See id. at 842.

175. Id.

176. Id. at 860.

HeinOnline -- 49 Stan. L. Rev. 725 1996-1997 726 STANFORD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 49:691 women to men. For MacKinnon, the inequality, or anti-subordination, approach understands the sexes to be not simply socially differentiated but socially unequal. In this broader view, all practices which subordinate women to men are prohibited. The differences approach, in its sensitivity to disparity and similarity, can be a useful corrective to sexism; both women and men can be damaged by sexism, although usually it is women who are. The inequality approach, by contrast, sees women's situation as a structural problem of enforced inferiority that needs to be radically altered.

MacKinnon believes that the inequality or anti-subordination approach best explains the harm of sexual harassment when applied to women's working lives, and has the greatest potential to transform sexually discriminatory workplace

practices through the use of law. She relies heavily upon a subordination account of sexual harassment by defining it in terms of what it does:

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 8 | 9 || 11 | 12 |   ...   | 22 |

Similar works:

«BDEW Bundesverband der Energieund Wasserwirtschaft e.V. Reinhardtstraße 32 10117 Berlin BDEW-Roadmap Realistische Schritte zur Umsetzung von Smart Grids in Deutschland Berlin, 11. Februar 2013 Inhalt 1. VORWORT 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 3. VISION 2022+ 10 4. DEFINITION WAS IST EIN SMART GRID? 12 5. PHASEN UND SCHRITTE ZUR REALISIERUNG VON SMART GRIDS IN DEUTSCHLAND 13 5.1 Aufbau – und Pionierphase 14 Schritt 1: Abgrenzung sowie Interaktion von Markt und Netz 14 Schritt 2: Rechtlicher und...»

«A of the PT blication 7560 Forest Road, onthly pu Am Cincinnati, Ohio 45255 MARCH 2010 Anderson High School Newsletter From the Principal... Dear Parents, The month of February has been very cold and blustery, but it hasn’t stopped the students at AHS from continuing to achieve at competitions or giving back to the community. First Lutheran Church in Over the Rhine was the recipient of more than 21 lawn and leaf bags of clothing and nine boxes of personal care items that were collected...»

«Perspektiven und Herausforderungen in der Integration muslimischer MitbürgerInnen in Österreich Executive Summary Prof. Dr. iur. Mathias Rohe, M.A. (Islamkunde), Richter am OLG Nürnberg Erlangen, Mai 2006 Seite 2 von 52 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite A. RAHMENDATEN I. Relevante Daten der Volkszählung in Österreich 2001 4 1. Herkunftsstaaten und Verteilung innerhalb Österreichs 4 2. Altersund Bildungsstruktur 5 II. Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen 6 1. Grundlagen 6 2. Individuelle Religionsausübung...»

«Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien Nr. 12/2007, 7. Jg. The Colonial “Emancipation” of Algerian Women: the Marriage Law of 1959 and the Failure of Legislation on Women’s Rights in the Post-Independence Era Neil MacMaster Abstract The failure of the newly independent Algerian state, after a long war of decolonization in which women played a major role, to introduce progressive reform to women’s legal, and thus social, status is widely recognized. The article...»

«Financial contribution towards travel and subsistence expenses for ACI candidates invited to inter-institutional accreditation tests Frequently asked questions (FAQ) Index: 1. Reimbursement principles 2. Submitting the documents 3. Financial Identification Form 4. Legal Entity Form 5. Expenses and supporting documents 6. Travel and accommodation 7. Insurance 8. After succeeding a test 1.Reimbursement principles What kind of expenses am I entitled to? You are entitled to receive a reimbursement...»

«10|2014 Umsetzung eines CO 2-Mindestpreises in Deutschland Internationale Vorbilder und Möglichkeiten für die Ergänzung des Emissionshandels Kurzstudie im Auftrag der European Climate Foundation August 2012 AUTOREN Forum Ökologisch-Soziale Marktwirtschaft e.V. Rupert Wronski, Swantje Küchler unter Mitarbeit von Helen Lückge, Kai Schlegelmilch und Karoline Duchene Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Schnutenhaus & Kollegen Iris Falke (Rechtsanwältin), Katharina Wandscher (Rechtsanwältin) IMPRESSUM...»

«HATSAN ARMS COMPANY Serious. Solid. Impact. AT44 & AT44-10 Series PCP Air Rifle INSTRUCTION MANUAL PLEASE READ THIS MANUAL BEFORE USING YOUR AIR GUN Thank you for choosing HATSAN AT44 / AT44-10 PCP air rifle. Always use caution when operating this rifle. Learn and obey the laws of your state and/or country, and be responsible in your use of this air rifle. Please read this manual completely before handling or shooting your air gun. It’s the sole responsibility of the user to use this air gun...»

«[ [ inter viewing your daughter’s date 30 MINUTES MAN-TO-MAN SAMPLE CHAPTER by dennis rainey with lawrence kimbrough Little Rock, Arkansas INTERVIEWING YOUR DAUGHTER’S DATE FamilyLife Publishing ® 5800 Ranch Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 1-800-FL-TODAY • FamilyLife.com FLTI, d/b/a FamilyLife ®, is a ministry of Campus Crusade for Christ International ® © 2007, 2012 Dennis Rainey 2012—Paperback Edition ISBN: 978-1-57229-976-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may...»

«Annette van Edig, Wolfram Laube und Nick van de Giesen Internationale und nationale Wasserkonflikte: Institutionelle und rechtliche Hintergründe der Wassernutzung des Voltaflusses am Beispiel Ghanas. Inhaltsverzeichnis I. Hintergrund: Das Glowa-Volta Projekt II. Das Voltabecken 1. Hydrologie und Klima 2. Fertiggestellte und geplante wasserwirtschaftliche Projekte am Voltabecken. 6 3. Aspekte internationaler Kooperation III. Nationale institutionelle und rechtliche Aspekte der Wassernutzung...»

«The Hidden Cost of Flying Brendon Sewill Important decisions about the future of aviation are due to be announced around the end of 2003 in a White Paper covering the next thirty years. The Department for Transport (DfT) published consultation papers in July 2002 setting out proposals for expansion at many airports, with options for new runways at Heathrow, Stansted, Birmingham, East Midlands, and in Scotland; and possible new airports at Cliffe, at Church Lawford between Coventry and Rugby,...»

«Grants made from the Q Fund The fund was established in 1946, but the following list details grants back to 1971. Kate Neale Towards research into ‘Distant Cousins: Music, Community and Identity in the Cornish Diaspora’ Keith Sparrow Towards ‘Cornish Manga / Manga Kernow’ Dr Jo Esra and Dr Jessica Allsop Towards ‘St Lawrence’s Hospital, Bodmin, Archival Research Project’ Robert Haskins Towards research into ‘Quarter Cornish’ Stephen Roberts Towards the publication of ‘Sir...»

«Tournament-9 Round 5 Tossups 1. This author wrote of a successful lawyer who loses his sense of meaning in life, Omar, in The Beggar. A bureaucrat accused of taking bribes, Isa, appears in his Autumn Quail. A more controversial work by him analyzed the three Abrahamic religions and was called The Children of Gebelawi. Such religious controversies led to the near-fatal 1994 stabbing of this author, whose magnum opus features Yasin witnessing Ahmad with his mistress. This author's major (*)...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.