WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 108 | 109 || 111 | 112 |   ...   | 113 |

«Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Juristischen Fakultät der Universität Regensburg vorgelegt von Kathrin Greve Erstberichterstatter: ...»

-- [ Page 110 ] --

Verfahrensordnungen ICTY: Rules of Procedure and Evidence, adopted on 11 February 1994, as amended on 6 April 2004 ICTR: Rules of Procedure and Evidence, adopted on 29 June 1995, as amended on 24 April Urteile des ICTY Die ausführlich analysierten Fälle sind durch kursive Titel gekennzeichnet.

Aleksovski (IT-95-14/1) Prosecutor v. Zlatko Aleksovski, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 25. Juni 1999, IT-95-14/1-T.

(Besetzt mit den Richtern Almiro Simxes Rodrigues (Vorsitz), Lal Chand Vohrah, Rafael Nieto-Navia) Blaskic (IT-95-14) Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, Trial Chamber I, Decision on the Applications of the Prosecutor dated 24 June and 30 August 1996 in respect of the Protection of Witnesses, 2. Oktober 1996, IT-95-14-T.3464 Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, Second Amended Indictment, 25. April 1997, IT-95-14-I.

NB: Die Entscheidung hat keine Randnummern und wird deshalb mit den Seitenzahlen der HTML-Fassung zitiert. Die Besetzung der Strafkammer ergibt sich nicht.

Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaskic, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 3. März 2000, IT-95-14-T.

(Besetzt mit den Richtern Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Almiro Rodrigues, Mohamed Shahabuddeen).

Delalic and Others (Celebici) (IT-96-21) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Initial Indictment,

19. März 1996, IT-96-21-I.

Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Motions by the Prosecution for Protective Measures for the Prosecution Witnesses pseudonymed “B” through to “M”, 28. April 1997, IT-96-22-T.

(Besetzt mit Richter Adolphus G. Karibi-Whyte (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Saad Saood Jan.) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Motion to Allow Witnesses K, L and M to Give their Testimony by Means of Video-link Conference, 28. Mai 1997, IT-96-21-T.

(Besetzt mit Richter Adolphus G. Karibi-Whyte (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Saad Saood Jan.) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Prosecution’s Motion for the Redaction of the Public Record, 5. Juni 1997, IT-96-21-T.

(Besetzt mit Richter Adolphus G. Karibi-Whyte (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Saad Saood Jan.) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Motion of the Joint Request of the Accused Persons regarding the Presentation of Evidence, dated 24 May 1998, 12. Juni 1998, IT-96-21-T.

(Besetzt mit Richter Adolphus G. Karibi-Whyte (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Saad Saood Jan.) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber II, Judgment, 16. Oktober 1998, IT-96-21-T.

(Besetzt mit Richter Adolphus G. Karibi-Whyte (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Saad Saood Jan.) Prosecutor v. Zejnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 20. Februar 2001, IT-96-21-A.

(Besetzt mit Richtern David Hunt (Vorsitz), Fouad Riad, Rafael Nieto-Navia, Mohamed Bennouna und Fausto Pocar.) Prosecutor v. Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Trial Chamber III, Sentencing Judgment, 9. Oktober 2001, IT-96-21-A.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Richard May (Vorsitz), Patrick Robinson, Mohamed Fassi Fihri.) Prosecutor v. Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic, Esad Landzo, Appeals Chamber, Judgment on Sentence Appeal, 8. April 2003, IT-96-21-Abis.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Theodor Meron (Vorsitz), Fausto Pocar, Mohamed Shahabuddeen, David Hunt und Asoka de Zoysa Gunawardana.) Furundzija (IT-95-17/1) Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts 13 and 14 of the Indictment (Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction), 29. Mai 1998, IT-95-17/1.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba (Vorsitz) und Richtern Antonio Cassese und Richard May.)

Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Amended Indictment, 2. Juni 1998, IT-95-17/1-PT.

Prosecutor v. Furundzija, Decision on Prosecutor’s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Witnesses “A” and “D” at trial, 11. Juni 1998, IT-95-17/1-T.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba (Vorsitz) und Richtern Antonio Cassese und Richard May.) Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Trial Chamber II, Judgment, 10. Dezember 1998, IT-95-17/1T.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba (Vorsitz) und Richtern Antonio Cassese und Richard May.) Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 21. Juli 2000, IT-95-17/1-A.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Mohamed Shahabuddeen (Vorsitz), Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah, Rafael Nieto-Navia, Patrick Lipton Robinson und Fausto Pocar.) Galic (IT-98-29) Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galic, Indictment, 26. März 1999, IT-98-29-I.

Jelisic Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisic, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 14. Dezember 1999, IT-95-10-T.

(Besetzt mit den Richtern Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Fouad Riad, Almiro Rodrigues).

Karadzic (IT-95-5) Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, Initial Indictment, 24. Juli 1995, IT-95-5I.

Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, Review of the Indictment pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 11. Juli 1996, IT-95-5&18-R61.





(Besetzt mit Richter Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Fouad Riad, abgedruckt in: 108 International Law Reports (1998), S. 87-141.) Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic, Amended Indictment, 28. April 2000, IT-95-5/18-I.

Kordic (IT-95-14/2) Prosecutor v. Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, Amended Indictment, 30. September 1998, IT-95-14/2-I.

Prosecutor v. Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, Trial Chamber III, Judgment, 26. Februar 2001, IT-95-14/2-T.

(Besetzt mit den Richtern Richard May (Vorsitz), Mohamed Bennouna, Patrick Robinson.) Krnojelac (IT-97-25) Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac, Third Amended Indictment, 25. Juni 2001, IT-97-25-I.

Prosecutor v. Milorad Krnojelac, Decision on the Defence Preliminary Motions on the Form of the Indictment, 24. Februar 1999, IT-97-25-PT.

(Besetzt mit Richtern David Hunt (Vorsitz), Antonio Cassese und Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba.) Krstic (IT-98-33) Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic, Amended Indictment, 27. Oktober 1999, IT-98-33-I.

Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic, Trial Chamber I, Judgment, 2. August 2001, IT-98-33-T.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Almiro Rodrigues (Vorsitz), Fouad Riad und Richterin Patricia Wald.) Kunarac (Foca) (IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1) Prosecutor v. Dragan Gagovic, Gojko Jankovic, Janko Janjic, Radomir Kovac, Zoran Vukovic, Dragan Zelenovic, Dragoljub Kunarac and Radovan Stankovic, Indictment, 26. Juni 1996, IT-96-23.

Prosecutor v. Dragan Gagovic, Gojko Jankovic, Janko Janjic, Radomir Kovac, Zoran Vukovic, Dragan Zelenovic, Dragoljub Kunarac and Radovan Stankovic, Decision on Prosecution Motion to Protect Victims and Witnesses, 29. April 1998, IT-96-23-PT.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Antonio Cassese (Vorsitz), Richard May und Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba.) Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Order on Prosecutor’s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Witnesses at Trial, 5. Oktober 1998, IT-96-23-PT.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba (Vorsitz) und Richtern Antonio Cassese und Richard May.)3465 Prosecutor v. Zoran Vukovic, Indictment, 5. Oktober 1999, IT-96-23/1.

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac and Radomir Kovac, Amended Indictment, 8. November 1999, IT-96-23-PT.

Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac and Others, Trial Chamber II, Judgment, 22. Februar 2001, IT-96-23 & IT-96-23/1.

NB: Diese Entscheidung hat keine Randnummern und wird deshalb mit den Seitenzahlen der HTMLFassung zitiert.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba (Vorsitz) und Richtern David Hunt und Fausto Pocar.) Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 12. Juni 2002, IT-96-23-A & IT-96-23/1-A.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Wolfgang Schomburg, Mehmet Güney und Theodor Meron.) Kupreskic (IT-95-16) Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreskic, Mirjan Kupreskic, Vlatko Kupreskic, Drago Josipovic, Dragan Papic, Vladimir Santic (Kupreskic and Others), Trial Chamber II, Judgment, 14. Januar 2000, IT-95-16.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Antonio Cassese (Vorsitz), Richard May und Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba.) Kvocka (IT-98-30 & IT-98-30/1) Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvocka, Milojica Kos, Mlado Radic, Zoran Zigic (Miroslav Kvocka and others), Trial Chamber I, Decision on Defence Preliminary Motions on the Form of the Indictment, 12. April 1999, IT-98-30-PT.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Richard May (Vorsitz), Mohamed Bennouna, Patrick Robinson.) Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvocka, Milojica Kos, Mlado Radic and Zoran Zigic, Amended Indictment, 31. Mai 1999, IT-98-30-PT.

Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvocka, Dragoljub Prcac, Milojica Kos, Mlado Radic, and Zoran Zigic, Amended Indictment, 21. August 2000, IT-98-30-PT.

Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvocka, Milojica Kos, Mlado Radic, Zoran Zigic and Dragoljub Prcac, Judgment, Trial Chamber I, 2. November 2001, IT-98-30/1-T.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Almiro Rodrigues (Vorsitz), Fouad Riad und Richterin Patricia Wald.) Martic (IT-95-11) Prosecutor v. Milan Martic, Amended Indictment, 14. Juli 2003, IT-95-11-I.

Meakic (IT-95-4) Prosecutor v. Zeljko Meakic and Others, Amended Indictment, 2. Juni 1998, IT-95-4.

Milosevic (IT-01-51) Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milosevic, Milan Milutinovic, Nikola Sainovic, Dragoljub Ojdanic, Vlajko Stojiljkovic, Second Amended Indictment, 16. Oktober 2001, IT-99-37-PT (“Kosovo”).

Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milosevic, Indictment, 22. November 2001, IT-01-51-I (“Bosnia and Herzegovina”).

Mladic (IT-95-5) Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, Initial Indictment, 24. Juli 1995, IT-95-5I.

Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, Review of the Indictment pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 11. Juli 1996, IT-95-5&18-R61.

(Besetzt mit Richter Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Fouad Riad, abgedruckt in: 108 International Law Reports (1998), S. 87-141.) Prosecutor v. Ratko Mladic, Amended Indictment, 10. Oktober 2002, IT-95-5/18-I.

Mrksic (IT-95-13) Prosecutor v. Mile Mrksic, Miroslav Radic, and Veselin Sljivancanin, Trial Chamber I, Review of the Indictment Pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 3. April 1996, IT-95-13-R61.

Nikolic (IT-94-2) Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, Initial Indictment, 4. November 1994, IT-94-2-I.

Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, Order Submitting Indictment to Trial Chamber for Hearing, 16.

Mai 1995, IT-94-2-R61.

Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, Review of Indictment Pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 20. Oktober 1995, IT-94-2-R61.

(Besetzt mit Richter Claude Jorda (Vorsitz), Richterin Elizabeth Odio Benito und Richter Fouad Riad, abgedruckt in: 108 International Legal Materials (1998), S. 21 ff.) Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, First Amended Indictment, 12. Februar 1999, IT-01-46-I.

Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolic, Trial Chamber II, Sentencing Judgment, 18. Dezember 2003, IT-94-2-S.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Wolfgang Schomburg (Vorsitz), Carmel A. Agius und Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba.) Tadic (IT-94-1) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic and Goran Borovnica, Indictment, 13. Februar 1995, IT-94-1-I, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses, 10. August 1995, IT-94-I-T (Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz) und Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses, 10. August 1995, IT-94-I-T, Separate Opinion of Judge Stephen.

Zitiert als: Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, 10. August 1995, Separate Opinion of Judge Stephen.3466 Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Defence Motion on Jurisdiction, 10. August 1995, IT-94-I-T.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz) und Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Amended Indictment, 1. September 1995, IT-94-1-I.

Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Appeals Chamber, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 2. Oktober 1995, IT-94-1-AR72.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Antonio Cassese (Vorsitz), Haopei Li, Jules Deschênes, Georges AbiSaab und Rustam S. Sidhwa.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Decision on the Defence Motions to Summon and Protect Defence Witnesses, and on the Giving of Evidence by Video-link, 25. Juni 1996, IT-94-T-I.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz) und Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic and Goran Borovnica, Amended Indictment, 14. Dezember 1995, IT-94-1-I.

Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Withdraw Protective Measures for Witness K, 12. November 1996, IT-94-I-T.3467 (Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz), Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Decision on Prosecution Motion to withdraw protective measures for witness L, 5. Dezember 1996, IT-94-T-I.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz) und Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Trial Chamber II, Opinion and Judgment, 7. Mai 1997, IT-94-1-T.

(Besetzt mit Richterin Gabrielle Kirk McDonald (Vorsitz), und Richtern Ninian Stephen und Datuk Lal Chand Vohrah.) Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Opinion and Judgment, Trial Chamber II, IT-94-1-T, 7. Mai 1997, Separate and dissenting opinion of Judge McDonald regarding the applicability of Art. 2 of the Statute.

Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 15. Juli 1999, IT-94-1-A.

(Besetzt mit Richtern Mohamed Shahabuddeen (Vorsitz), Antonio Cassese, Wang Tieya, Rafael Nieto-Navia, und Richterin Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba.) NB: Da Richter Stephens abweichende Meinung keine Randnummern enthält, wird sie hier mit den Seitenangaben der ausgedruckten HTML-Fassung zitiert.

NB: Die Entscheidung hat keine Randnummern und wird deshalb mit Seitenzahlen der HTML-Fassung zitiert.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 108 | 109 || 111 | 112 |   ...   | 113 |


Similar works:

«Annette van Edig, Wolfram Laube und Nick van de Giesen Internationale und nationale Wasserkonflikte: Institutionelle und rechtliche Hintergründe der Wassernutzung des Voltaflusses am Beispiel Ghanas. Inhaltsverzeichnis I. Hintergrund: Das Glowa-Volta Projekt II. Das Voltabecken 1. Hydrologie und Klima 2. Fertiggestellte und geplante wasserwirtschaftliche Projekte am Voltabecken. 6 3. Aspekte internationaler Kooperation III. Nationale institutionelle und rechtliche Aspekte der Wassernutzung...»

«LINCOLN PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT SUMMER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Applications may be picked up after January 2, 2014, at the Department of Parks and Recreation, 2740 A Street. Applications are also available on the City of Lincoln website at http://lincoln.ne.gov/city/parks/About/employment.htm. All applications must be returned to the Parks and Recreation Office at 2740 ‘A’ Street, 68502, unless otherwise noted. Applications received by March 3, 2014, will be given preference. In...»

«[ [ inter viewing your daughter’s date 30 MINUTES MAN-TO-MAN SAMPLE CHAPTER by dennis rainey with lawrence kimbrough Little Rock, Arkansas INTERVIEWING YOUR DAUGHTER’S DATE FamilyLife Publishing ® 5800 Ranch Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 1-800-FL-TODAY • FamilyLife.com FLTI, d/b/a FamilyLife ®, is a ministry of Campus Crusade for Christ International ® © 2007, 2012 Dennis Rainey 2012—Paperback Edition ISBN: 978-1-57229-976-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may...»

«Écranosphère n° 2 (hiver 2015) The Inception of Cynicism from the Ruins of Sexual Difference: Christopher Nolan’s Dialectic of Masculine Enlightenment Tamas Nagypal York University Résumé/Abstract This paper maps the antagonism of two subject positions, in Christopher Nolan’s Inception, that mediate the contradictions of the film’s late capitalist universe. Drawing on the Lacanian formulas of sexuation, it argues that the femme fatale, Mal, has a relation to the social symbolic order...»

«EFFECTS OF ISOTROPIC FLEXIBILITY ON WINGS UNDER A PLUNGING MOTION By DIEGO GUSTAVO CAMPOS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA © 2012 Diego Gustavo Campos To my parents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Lawrence Ukeiley for his guidance and support on my research. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Peter Ifju and Dr. Rick Lind, for reviewing my work...»

«ENVI Classic Tutorial: Linear Feature Extraction with Intelligent Digitizer Linear Feature Extraction with Intelligent Digitizer 2 Files Used in this Tutorial 2 About Intelligent Digitizer 2 Opening a File for Coastline Extraction 2 Extracting a Coastline 3 Opening a File for Road Extraction 5 Extracting Roads 5 Using Automatic Post-Processing Tools 7 Using Manual Post-Processing Tools 9 Page 1 of 12 © 2014 Exelis Visual Information Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This information is not...»

«This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary Metalclad Corporation v Mexico Year of the award: 2000 Forum: ICSID Applicable investment treaty: NAFTA Arbitrators Timeline of the dispute Prof. Sir Elihu Lauterpacht – 2 October 1996 – notice of arbitration President 19 May 1997 – arbitral tribunal constituted Mr. Benjamin R. Civiletti 30 August 2000 – arbitral award Mr. José Luis...»

«HATSAN ARMS COMPANY Serious. Solid. Impact. AT44 & AT44-10 Series PCP Air Rifle INSTRUCTION MANUAL PLEASE READ THIS MANUAL BEFORE USING YOUR AIR GUN Thank you for choosing HATSAN AT44 / AT44-10 PCP air rifle. Always use caution when operating this rifle. Learn and obey the laws of your state and/or country, and be responsible in your use of this air rifle. Please read this manual completely before handling or shooting your air gun. It’s the sole responsibility of the user to use this air gun...»

«Sacred Laws in Earthly Courts: Legal Pluralism in Canadian Religious Freedom Litigation Howard Kislowicz* In three cases, Amselem, Multani and Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, the Supreme Court of Canada examined conflicts between state law and the religious practices of litigants. While much has been written about the holdings in these cases, less is known about the experience of the participants. Based on in-depth interviews with litigants, lawyers and experts involved in these cases,...»

«Duke Law Journal VOLUME JUNE NUMBER JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATIONS OF LAWt THE HONORABLE ANTONIN SCALIA** When I was invited to speak here at Duke Law School, I had originally intended to give a talk that reflected upon the relationship among the Bork confirmation hearings, the proposed federal salary increase, capital punishment, Roe v. Wade, and Law and Astrology. I was advised, however, that the subject of this lecture series is administrative law, and so have had to...»

«R. Eugene Jackson Big Dog Publishing The Emperor’s Hot New Duds! Copyright © 2015, R. Eugene Jackson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Emperor’s Hot New Duds! is fully protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America, and all of the countries covered by the Universal Copyright Convention and countries with which the United States has bilateral copyright relations including Canada, Mexico, Australia, and all nations of the United Kingdom. Copying or reproducing all or any part of...»

«Thomas Petermann Dezember 2003 Constanze Scherz Arnold Sauter 6)* Biometrie und Ausweisdokumente Leistungsfähigkeit, politische Rahmenbedingungen, rechtliche Ausgestaltung Zweiter Sachstandsbericht TAB Arbeitsbericht Nr. 93 TAB Das Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB) berät das Parlament und seine Ausschüsse in Fragen des gesellschaftlich-technischen Wandels. Das TAB ist eine organisatorische Einheit des Instituts für Technikfolgenabschätzung und...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.