WWW.ABSTRACT.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstract, dissertation, book
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 9 | 10 || 12 |

«D. ANITHA KUMARI THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE ACHARYA N.G RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, RAJENDRANAGAR IN PARTIAI FULFILLMENT OF ...»

-- [ Page 11 ] --

6. Reduced larval and pupal weights, prolonged larval and pupal development on resistant genotypes (ICPL 332, ICPL 84060, ICP 7035, ICPL 187-1, ICPL 88039 and ICP 7203-1) compared to the susceptible genotypes (ICPL 87, ICPL 871 19 and ICPL 87091) indicated that antibiosis is one of the components of

–  –  –

inhibitor or antifeedent substance or both existed in the resistant genotypes.

7. Five morphologically distinct trichomes (Type A, B, C, D and E) were identified from pods and calyxes of the 12 pigeonpea genotypes. Type A and B trichomes were present in greater density in flowers and pods. In case of pods, Type D trichomes were present in greater numbers as compared to Type A. High density of glandular trichomes (Type A and Type B) might contribute to the larval mortality on the resistant genotypes (ICPL 84060, ICPL 871 19, ICPL 88039, ICP 7203-1, ICPL 187-1 and T21).

8. The pod surface extracts of ICPL 87 and ICPL 332 stimulated feeding by the third- fourth-and fifth-instar larve of H,armigera when presented at pod surface equivalents. The attraction of H.armigera larvae to ICPL 87 and lCPL 332 plant extracts might be due to some chemical compounds present in the pod surface extracts.

9. Among the 12 genotypes tested, the amounts of potassium and phosphorus were lower in resistant genotypes such as lCPL 332, ICPL 84060, ICP 7035 and ICPL 187-1, but high in the susceptible check, ICPL 87. Protein content was quite high in the pod borer resistant genotypes (ICPL 332, ICP 7035 and ICPL 84060).

–  –  –

low phosphorus and potassium contents may intluence the extent of feeding.

10. Studies on yield loss under protected and unprotected conditions revealed tolerance as one of the mechanisms of resistance to H.armigera. Reduction in grain yield was lower in resistant check lCPL 332, followed by lCPL 84060, ICPL 87 and ICPL 871 19 indicating tolerance to pod borer damage in these genotypes.

–  –  –

used in pigeonpea improvement programs. The resistance mechanisms involved in these genotypes can be exploited to develop varieties resistant to H. armigera in

–  –  –

Annadurai R S, Murugesan S and Senrayan R 1990 Age correlated tissue preference of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) and Spodoptera spp(F) with special reference to phenolic substrates. Proceedings Indian Academy Sciences (Animal Sciences) 99:3 17-325.

h e s N 3, Jadhav D I, Bond G S and King A B S 1992 lnsecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in South India. Pesticide Science 34: 355-364.

Ascensao L N, Marques and Pais M S 1995 Glandular trichomes on vegetative and reproductive organs of Leonotis leonurus (La-maiacez). Annals of Botany (London) 75: 61 9-626.

Beck S D and Hanec W 1958 Effects of amino acids on feeding behaviour of the European Corn borer, Pyrausra mubilalis (Hubner). Journal of Insect physiology 2: 85-96.

Bhatnagar V S 1980 A report on research on the Heliothis complex at ICRISAT (India) 1974-79.In Proceedings of All India Workshop on Consolidation of Pest Management Recommendations and Guidelines of Research 24 - 26 Apr. 1980, Udaipur, India.

Bhatnagar V S, Sithanantham S, Pawar C S, Jadhav D S, Rao V K and Reed W 1983 Conservation and augmentation of natural enemies with reference to IPM in chickpea and pigeonpea In Proceedings of the international workshop of integrated pest control in grain legumes, 4-9 April 1983 EMBRAPA Goiania, Brazil 157-180.

Bhosale D J and Nawale R N 1983 Relative susceptibility of pigeonpea germplasm

to gram pod borer. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 8 :

30-3 1.

Bilapate G G, Rao Deo A K and Pawar V M 1988 Investigations on Heliothis armigera (Hubner) in Marathwada-V111 Growth with reference to progression factors for successive instars on pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Entomology 50: 462-467.

Bisen S S and Sheldrake A R 1981 The anatomy of the pigeonpea. Research Bulletin International Crops Research Institute For the Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) Patancheru, Andhra pradesh,India.

Breese E L 1969 The measurement and significance of genotype environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24 : 27-44.

Butter N S and Singh S 1996 Ovipositional response of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) to different cotton genotypes. Phytoparasitica 24: 97- 102.

Chauhan Y S 1990 Pigeonpea: optimum agronomic management. In The pigeonpea (Nene Y L, Hall S D and Sheila V.K eds.). Wallingford, UK CAB International, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 257-278.

Clement S L, El-Din Sharaf, El-Din, N Weigand S and Lateef S S 1994 Research achievements in plant resistance to insect pests of cool season food legumes Euphytica 73: 41-50.

Comstock R E and Moll R H 1963 Genotype-environment interactions. In:

Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding Hanson, W D and H F Robinson, eds.

National Academic Science Research Council Washington D.C 164-196.

Courtney S P and Kibota T 1990 Mother does not know the best : Ed selection of hosts by ovipositing insects. In insect plant interactions E A Bernays 61-68.

Cunningham S 4 West and Wright D J 1998 Learning in the nectar foraging behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. Ecological Entomology 23: 363-369.





Dahiya S K and Singh S 1993 Stability analysis in advanced lines of pigeonpea.

Annals Applied of Biology 9: 56-60.

Dahiya S S, Chauhan Y S, Johansen C, Waldia R S, Sekhon H S and Nandal J K 2002 Extra short duration pigeonpea for diversifying wheat based cropping systems in the sub tropics. Experimental Agriculture : 38: 1-1 1.

Dahiya S S, Chauhan Y S, Srivastava S K, Sekhon H S, Waldia R S, Gowda C L L and Johansen C 2001 Growing extra-short-duration pigeonpea in rotation with wheat in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Natural Resource Management Programs. Report No. 1.,India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh. 43.

Desai N G Bharodia P S and Kukadia M U 1991 Study of genotype x year interaction in pigeonpea. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 13: 14-1 5.

Dhandapani N and Balasubramanian M 1980 Consumption and utilization of different food plants by Heliolhis armigera (Hubner) (Noctuiidae, Lepidoptera). Entomon 5: 99-103.

Dodia D A, Pate1 A 1, Patel I S, Dhulia F K and Tikka S B S 1996 Antibiotic effect of pigeonpea wild relatives on Helicoverpa armigera. International chickpea and pigeonpea newsletter 3: 100-101.

Dodia D A and Patel J R 1994 Antibiosis in pigeonpea to Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. International chickpea and pigeonpea newsletter 1: 39-40.

Doss R P, Luthi R, Edelman D L and Hrutford B F 1982 Sitosterol and quercetin 3

- galactoside, obscure root weevil feeding stimulants from Rhododendron.

Jour. Agric.Fd.Chem. 30 : 1079 - 1082.

Doss R P 1983 Activity of obscure root weevil sciopithes obsurus. (Coleopetera:

Curculionidae) phagostimulants individually and in combination.

Environmental Entomology 13: 848-851.

Dua R P, Gowda C L L, Shiv Kumar, Saxena K B, Govil J N, Singh B B, Singh A K, Singh R P, Singh V P and Kranthi S 2002 Breeding for Resistance to Helicoverpa - Effectiveness and Limitations. In Helicoverpa armigera - the way ahead (Sharma, H.C., eds.), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Eberhart S A and Russel W A 1966 Stability parameters for comparing varieties.

Crop science: 6: 36-40.

FA0 2001 Agricultural Production Statistics. United Nations.

Finlay K W and Wilkinson G N 1963 The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research IS: 742-754.

Fitt G P 1986 The influence of shortage of hosts on the specificity of oviposition behaviour in species of Daucus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Physiological Entomology 11:-133-143.

Fitt G P 1989 The ecology of Heliothis to agroecosystems. Annual Rreview of Entomology 34: 17-52.

Frelichowski J E and Juvik 1 A 2001 Sesquiterpene carboxylic acids from a wild tomato species affect larval feeding behavior and survival of Helicoverpa zea and Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae) Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 1249-1259.

Gothilfs and Beck S D 1967 Larval feeding behaviour of the cabbage looper Trichoplusia ni. Journal of Insect Physiology 13: 1039-1054.

Green P W C, Stevenson P C, Simmonds M S J and Sharma H C 2002 Can larvae of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuiidae), select between wild and cultivated pigeonpea [Cajanus sp (Fabaceae)]? Bulletin of Entomological Research 92: 45-5 1.

Green P W C, Stevenson P C, Simmonds M S J and Sharma H C 2003 Phenolic compounds on the pod surface of pigeonpea, Cajrtnus cujan, mediate feeding behaviour of larvae of Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of chemical Ecology.

Gurr G M and McGrath D 2001 Effect of plant variety, plant age and photoperiod on glandular pubescence and host-plant resistance to potato moth (Phthorimaea operculella) in Lycopersicon spp. Annals of Applied Biology 138: 221-230.

Hahn D H, Faubion J M and Rooney L W 1981 Analysis of benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives of sorghum by I-IPCL. Cereal Food World 26: 505-506.

Hardwick D F 1965 The corn ear worm complex. Memoirs of Entomological society of Canada, Ottawa, Canada 247.

Hartlieb E and Rembold H 1996 Behavioral response of female Helicoverpa (Heliothis) armigera (Hub). (Lepidopetera: Noctuiidae) moths to synthetic

pigeonpea (Cajanus cajant.) Kairomone. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22:

821-837.

Hmimina M 1988 Potential biotique of Heliothis armigera Hb. (Lepidoptera:

Noctiidae) Influence due substrata alimentaire et incidence Sur I 'occupation des cultures. Journal of Applied Entomology 106: 241-25 1.

ICRISAT 1985 Annual Report International Crops Research Institute for Semi arid Tropics, A.P., India 1-20.

lCRlSAT 1991 Annual Report International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics, Andhra Pradesh lndia 5 5.

ICRISAT 1999 The medium term plan. International Crop Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics, Andhra Pradesh, India : 1-20.

Jackson M L 1967 Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of lndia Private Limited, New Delhi.

John peter A 1995 Pigeonpea tichomes :a promising source for pod borer resistance.

IPM and IRM Newsletter for Legume Crops in Asia 2: 5-6.

Khurana A D and Verma A N 1983 Some biochemical plant characters in relation to susceptibility of sorghum to stem borer and shoot fly. Indian Journal of Entomology 45: 29-34.

Kimmins F M, Padgham D E and Stevenson P C 1995 Growth inhibition of the cotton boll worm (Helicoverpa armigera) larvae by Caffeoylquinic acids from the wild groundnut, Arachis paraguariensis. lnsect Science and its Application 16 : 363-368.

King A B S 1994 Heliothis/Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In Insect pests of cotton (G.A. Mathews and J.P. Turnstall eds.) CAB lnternational Wallingford, Oxon, U.K, 39-106.

Kofoid K D, Ross W M and Murnm R F 1978 Yield stability of sorghum randommating populations. Crop Science 18 : 677-679.

Knap J L, Heidin P A and Douglass W A 1966 A chemical analysis of corn silk from single corn of dent corn rated as resistant, intermediate and susceptible to the corn eanvorms. Journal of Economic Entomology 59: 1062-1064.

Kushwaha K S and Malik B P S 1987. Effect of Sowing time and plant type on pod borer incidence and grain yield in some pigeonpea genotypes, lnternational Pigeonpea Newsletter 6: 65-67.

Kushwaha K S and Malik B P S 1988 Reaction of some pigeonpea genotypes to

gram pod borer under field conditions Indian Journal of Ecology IS:

194-195.

Lakshmipathi 2000 Behavioural studies of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidopetra: Noctiidae) and its management in chickpea, M.Sc(Ecology) thesis, Pondicheny University, Pondicheny, India.

Lateef S S and Pimbert 1990 The search for host plant resistance to Heticoverpa armigera. In Proceedings of first consultative group on Host selection behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. International croos research institute for the semi arid tropics ~itanche;, A P, India.

Lateef S S 1985 Gram pod borer Heliothis armigera (hubner) resistance in chickpea.

Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment 14: 95-102.

Lateef S S, Reddy L J,Reed W and Faries D G 1981 Arylosia scarabaeoides: a source of resistance to Heliothis armigera. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 1: 32-34.

–  –  –

Loganathan M 1981 Studies on ecology and effect of host plants on the susceptibility of larvae of Heliothis armigera (Hubner) to insecticides.

M.Sc(Ag), thesis, Tamilnadu Agricultural Unviersity, Coimbatore, India.

Mc.Caffery A R, Walker A J and Topper C P 1991 Insecticide resistance in the

bollworm, HeNcoverpa armigera from Indonesia. Pesticide Science 32:

85-90.

Minkenberg 0 P J M, Tatar M and Rosenheim J A 1992. Egg load as a major

source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behaviour. Oikos 65:

134-142.

Mohan S, Jayaraj S, Purushotham D and Rangarajan A V 1987 Can the use of

Azospirilture biofertilizer control sorghum shootfly. Current Science 56:

723-735.

Murkute G R, Dhage A R, Desai B B, Kale A A, Mote U N and Aher R P 1993 Biochemical parameters associated with Pod borer damage as influenced by maturity group and growth stages of pigeon pea [(Cajanus, cajan (Z)] Mill Spp. Legume Research 16: 5 1-56.

Mustapha, Jallow F A and Zalucki M P 1998 Effects of egg load on the host

selection behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera :

Noctuiidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 46: 291-299.

Nam N H, Chauhan Y S and Johansen C 1993. Comparison of extra-short-duration pigeonpea with short-season legumes under rainfed conditions on Alfisols.

Experimental Agriculture 29: 307-316.

Nene Y L, Hall S D and Sheila V H 1990 The pigeonpea. CAB International Wallingford, UK : 490.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 9 | 10 || 12 |


Similar works:

«BIBLIOGRAPHY A. PRIMARY SOURCES (i) Unpublished Alvord Emery D., “The Gospel of the Plow,” Unpublished, 1950. Gwerengwe J., Estate Manager, Sanyati Main Estate, File: 6.1 Management Meetings, “Minutes of the Meeting Held in the Sanyati Guest House on Saturday 25 February 1989 to Review the Cotton Picker Turn Out.” Ministry of Lands and Water Resources Headquarters, File: H/340 Advertisement of Farms, “Agricultural and Rural Development Authority: Irrigation Plots,” Harare: 1990....»

«CHAPTER TWO PEASANT PRODUCTION AND DIFFERENTIATION: THE SANYATI HINTERLAND (1939 – 1964) INTRODUCTION A cursory look at Sanyati communal lands in this period does not portray a distinctive pattern of rural differentiation nor does it give a hint that towards the end of the 1960s the state would institute irrigation agriculture in the area which, subsequently was to influence differentiation in its own significant way. There has been little attempt by historians to engage in active discourse...»

«Demystifying Farmer Field School Concepts Kevin D Gallagher 1, Arnoud R Braun 2 and Deborah Duveskog 3 This article responds to the recent paper on farmer field schools (FFS) by Dr. Kristin Davis in the Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Volume 13, Number 1, page 91-97 which was subsequently noted in the ECAPAPA Newsletter Vol. 9 No. 06. The paper raises some interesting issues in agricultural extension, but tends to confuse some aspects of FFS such as notions of...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.abstract.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Abstract, dissertation, book

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.